model like you mean it

(Ozzie is our most excellent resident historian)

Historical Accuracy in Armor Modeling

I think one of the most important part of executing a model or diorama, apart from the enjoyment of the hobby, is getting the historical details correct. It’s important to have several reference books on tanks, uniforms and equipment to ensure the details of the model are done correctly. That generally takes care of the technical aspect of accuracy. There is another aspect, namely the historical aspect that deserves attention.  The best way to get those details correct is to scour over as many books and photographs as possible. Eventually, the trends emerge, a pattern of soldierly conduct becomes visible and it becomes easier to develop a realistic diorama based on hours of enjoyable photo study and research.

I, for one, enjoy the obscure little details that are hidden in unpublished photographs. I recall a diorama where a modeler placed an M3 fighting knife in an M8 scabbard and mounted it upside down on the web suspenders of his ww2 paratrooper figure. He was chastised for using what was “clearly” only done during Vietnam. One observant fellow quickly posted an original WW2 photo with a paratrooper doing the same thing. End of discussion.

I believe it is imperative to devote an appropriate amount of time studying photos before embarking on a diorama. The more the study/research, the more accurate and hence realistic the rendering will be. Rather than spending hundreds of dollars on mounds of books (which I think is fine) I would recommend visiting:

http://www.pixpast.com/

Here you will find thousands of unpublished photos of every military subject. Apply for a username and login and you can start viewing photos. You can post as well, particularly if you collect military images. My friend Ian Spring, who orchestrates the site, is a wonderful host. I think his site is a great place to begin your research…good luck!